Header
Home | Sitemap Set as homepage | Add to favorites
  Search the Site     » Advanced Search
Sections



Synchronous CDMA Signal Model

by

image

Synchronous CDMA Signal Model

We start by considering the most basic multiple-access signal model: a baseband K-user time-invariant synchronous additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) system, employing periodic (short) spreading sequences and operating with a coherent BPSK modulation format. (An approach to adaptive detection in (long) aperiodic code DS-SS systems is developed in [61].) As noted in Chapter 1, the continuous-time waveform received by a given user in such a system can be modeled as follows:

Equation 2.1

graphics/02equ001.gif


where M is the number of data symbols per user in the data frame of interest; T is the symbol interval; Ak, graphics/028fig01.gif, and sk(t) denote, respectively, the received complex amplitude, the transmitted symbol stream, and the normalized signaling waveform of the kth user; and n(t) is the baseband complex Gaussian ambient noise with independent real and imaginary components and with power spectral density s2. It is assumed that for each user k, graphics/028fig01.gif is a collection of independent equiprobable ±1 random variables, and the symbol streams of different users are independent. For the direct-sequence spread-spectrum format, each user's signaling waveform is of the form

Equation 2.2

graphics/02equ002.gif


where N is the processing gain, graphics/029fig01.gif is a signature sequence of ±1's assigned to the kth user, and y(·) is a chip waveform of duration Tc = T/N and unit energy graphics/029fig02.gif

At the receiver, the received signal r(t) is filtered by a chip-matched filter and then sampled at the chip rate. The sample corresponding to the jth chip of the ith symbol is thus given by

Equation 2.3

graphics/02equ003.gif


The resulting discrete-time signal corresponding to the ith symbol is then given by

Equation 2.4

graphics/02equ004.gif


Equation 2.5

graphics/02equ005.gif


with

graphics/029equ01.gif


where graphics/029fig03.gif is a complex Gaussian random variable with independent real and imaginary components; and graphics/029fig04.gif [Here Nc(·, ·) denotes a complex Gaussian distribution and IN denotes an N x N identity matrix.] graphics/029fig05.gif and graphics/029fig06.gif.

Suppose that we are interested in demodulating the data bits of a particular user, say user 1, graphics/029fig07.gif, based on the received waveforms graphics/029fig08.gif. A linear receiver for this purpose can be described by a weight vector graphics/029fig09.gif such that the desired user's data bits are demodulated according to

Equation 2.6

graphics/02equ006.gif


Equation 2.7

graphics/02equ007.gif


Note that the linear equalizers and multiuser detectors discussed in Chapter 1 can all be written in this form, as will be seen below. In case the complex amplitude A1 of the desired user is unknown, we can resort to differential detection. Define the differential bit as

Equation 2.8

graphics/02equ008.gif


Then using the linear detector output[1] (2.6), the following differential detection rule can be used:

[1] For simplicity, we will use the term "detector" to refer to the overall detector (2.6)–(2.7) or (2.6) and (2.9), to the detection statistic (2.6), and to the detector's weight vector.

Equation 2.9

graphics/02equ009.gif


Substituting (2.4) into (2.6), the output of the linear receiver w1 can be written as

Equation 2.10

graphics/02equ010.gif


In (2.10), the first term on the right-hand side contains the useful signal of the desired user, the second term contains the signals from other undesired users—the multiple-access interference (MAI), and the last term contains the ambient Gaussian noise. The simplest linear receiver is the conventional matched filter, where w1 = s1. As noted in Chapter 1, such a matched-filter receiver is optimal only in a single-user channel (i.e., K = 1). In a multiuser channel (i.e., K > 1), this receiver may perform poorly since it makes no attempt to ameliorate the MAI, a limiting source of interference in multiple-access channels. Two popular forms of linear detectors that are capable of suppressing the MAI are the linear decorrelating detector and the linear minimum mean-square-error (MMSE) detector, which are discussed next.


531 times read

Related news

» DSSS Spreading Sequence
by admin posted on Apr 30,2007
» Internal Sources of Interference
by admin posted on Aug 17,2007
» Next-Generation CDMA Technologies
by admin posted on Jan 10,2007
» IEEE 802.11 Direct-Sequence Spread Spectrum
by admin posted on Jan 10,2007
» Multicarrier CDMA Techniques
by admin posted on Jan 10,2007


More Top News
Cisco Wireless Networking
Most Popular
Featured Author