Header
Home | Sitemap Set as homepage | Add to favorites
  Search the Site     » Advanced Search
Sections



Digital Interference

by

image

Digital Interference

Now let us consider a system with one spread-spectrum (SS) signal and one narrowband binary signal in an otherwise additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. We assume for now that the narrowband signal is synchronized with the SS signal. Furthermore, we assume a relationship between the data rates of the two users (i.e., m bits of the narrowband user occur for each bit of the SS user). (Given the typical data rates employed in many wireless systems, it is often reasonable to assume an integer relationship between the bit rates. Situations in which this is not true are considered in [57].) As shown in Fig. 7.11, the narrowband digital signal can be regarded as m virtual users, each with its virtual signature sequence. The first virtual user's signature sequence equals 1 during the first narrowband user's bit interval (i.e., a virtual chip interval) and zero everywhere else. Similarly, each other narrowband user's bit can be thought of as a signal arising from a virtual user with a signature sequence with only one nonzero entry. It is obvious from this construction that the signature waveforms of the virtual users are orthogonal to each other. However, in general, the kth virtual user has some cross-correlation with the spread-spectrum user. If we use r to denote the vectors formed by the cross-correlations, defined explicitly in (7.108), the cross-correlation matrix R of this virtual multiuser system has the following simple structure (note that the SS user is numbered 0, and the m virtual users are numbered from 1 to m):

Equation 7.107

graphics/07equ107.gif


Figure 7.11. Virtual CDMA system: synchronous case.

graphics/07fig11.gif

We have assumed that the narrowband user had a faster data rate than the SS user (but this rate is still much slower than the chip rate). The opposite case can also hold, and our analysis applies to it as well, although we do not discuss that case explicitly. The covariance matrix of the system in that case has the same structure as (7.107).

Let T be the bit duration of the SS user, so that T/m is the bit duration of the narrowband user. Similarly, let N be the processing gain of the SS signal, so that the chip interval has length T/N. By our assumption that the interferer is narrowband, we have N >> m. Let s(t) be the normalized signature waveform of the SS user [i.e., s(t) is zero outside the interval [0,T] and has unity energy]. Similarly, let p(t) be the normalized bit waveform of the narrowband user [i.e., p(t) is zero outside the interval [0,T/m] and has unity energy]. Then the normalized signature waveform of the kth virtual user is pk(t) = p(t–(k–1)T/m). The cross-correlation vector mentioned earlier is r = [r1 r2 ... rm]T, where rk is the cross-correlation between the kth virtual user and the SS user, defined as

Equation 7.108

graphics/07equ108.gif


where the inner product notation denotes graphics/417equ01.gif

We assume that the SS user and the narrowband user are sending digital data through the same channel characterized by AWGN with power spectral density s2. Let AI be the received amplitude of the narrowband signal and A be the received amplitude of the SS signal. We use the notation that the narrowband user data bits during the interval (0,T) are d1, d2,..., dm, and the SS bit is b. When the users are synchronous, it is sufficient to consider the one-shot version of the received signal:

Equation 7.109

graphics/07equ109.gif


where n(t) is the white Gaussian noise with power spectral density s2.

The linear MMSE detector for user 0 (i.e., the SS user) is characterized by the impulse response w L2[0, T], such that the decision on b0 is

Equation 7.110

graphics/07equ110.gif


A closed-form expression for w is given by [520] as

Equation 7.111

graphics/07equ111.gif


where wT = [w0, w1, ..., wm] is the first row of the matrix

Equation 7.112

graphics/07equ112.gif


and A = diag{A, AI, ... AI}. Substituting (7.107) into (7.112), we have

Equation 7.113

graphics/07equ113.gif


The following matrix identity can be easily verified,

Equation 7.114

graphics/07equ114.gif


where g = 1–rT r/ab.

Now on defining a = 1 + s2/A2 and b = 1 + s2/A12, the first row of C in (7.113) is then given by

Equation 7.115

graphics/07equ115.gif


Substituting (7.115) into (7.111) we get an expression for the linear MMSE detector for the SS user:

Equation 7.116

graphics/07equ116.gif


Using (7.74), the SINR at the output of the linear MMSE detector w(t) becomes

Equation 7.117

graphics/07equ117.gif


That is, the SINR is the ratio of the desired SS signal power to the sum of the powers due to narrowband interference and noise at the output of the filter w(t). Substituting (7.116) into (7.117), we obtain

Equation 7.118

graphics/07equ118.gif


Figure 7.12 illustrates the virtual multiuser system for the asynchronous case. Let t0 be the fixed time lag between the spread-spectrum bit and the nearest previous start of a narrowband bit (i.e., 0 t0 T/m). We see that because of the time lag t0, the virtual user 1 in Fig. 7.11 effectively contributes two interference signals during an SS bit interval: at the beginning and end of the SS bit interval, respectively. We can therefore treat the asynchronous system as a synchronous system with one additional virtual user (i.e., a synchronous system with one SS user) and m + 1 virtual users. The preceding analysis therefore holds in the asynchronous case as well, with only minor modification.

Figure 7.12. Virtual CDMA system: asynchronous case.

169 times read

Related news

» Narrowband Radio Modulation
by admin posted on Apr 25,2007
» DSSS
by admin posted on Aug 13,2007
» IEEE 802.11 Direct-Sequence Spread Spectrum
by admin posted on Jan 10,2007
» Wireless Transmission Media
by admin posted on May 10,2010


More Top News
Cisco Wireless Networking
Most Popular
Featured Author