Least-Squares Regression and Linear Decorrelator
Consider the synchronous signal model (4.2). Denote qK
Ak bk. Then (4.2) can be rewritten as
Equation 4.5
or in matrix notation,
Equation 4.6
where
. Consider the linear regression
problem of estimating the K unknown parameters
q1, q2, . . . , qK from the N
observations r1, r2, . . . , rN in (4.5). Classically, this problem can be
solved by minimizing the sum of squared errors (or squared residuals) [i.e.,
through the least-squares (LS) method]:
Equation 4.7
If nj ~ N (0, s2), the pdf of the received signal r under the true parameters q is given by
Equation 4.8
It is easily seen from (4.8) that the maximum-likelihood estimate of q under the i.i.d.
Gaussian noise assumption is given by the LS solution
in (4.7). Upon differentiating (4.7),
is then the solution to the
following linear system equations
Equation 4.9
or in matrix form,
Equation 4.10
Define the cross-correlation matrix of the signature waveforms
of all users as R
STS. Assuming that the user signature waveforms are
linearly independent (i.e., S has a full
column rank K), R is invertible, and the LS solution to (4.9) or (4.10) is given by
Equation 4.11
We observe from (4.11)
that the LS estimate
is exactly the output of the linear
decorrelating multiuser detector for the K users
(cf. Proposition
2.1). This is not surprising, since the linear decorrelating detector gives
the maximum likelihood estimate of the product of the amplitude and the data bit
qk = Akbk in Gaussian noise [296]. Given the
estimate
, the estimated amplitude and the data bit are then determined
by
Equation 4.12
Equation 4.13