by
 Adaptive Receiver Structures
We next consider adaptive algorithms for sequentially
estimating the blind linear detector. First, we address adaptive implementation
of the blind channel estimator discussed above. Suppose that the signal subspace
Us is known. Denote by z[i] the
projection of ... [full story]
|
by
 NAHJ Subspace Tracking
The algorithm we present here was developed in [411, 412]. It is a member of the QR-Jacobi
family in the sense that it uses Givens rotations during the updating process.
However, this algorithm avoids the QR step entirely. ... [full story]
|
by
 PASTd Algorithm
Let be a random vector with
autocorrelation matrix Cr = E{r[i]r[i]H}. Consider the scalar function
Equation 2.150
with a matrix argument (r <
N). It can be shown that [586]:
W is a stationary point of
... [full story]
|
by
 Subspace Tracking Algorithms
It is seen from Section 2.5 that the linear
multiuser detectors are obtained once the signal subspace components are
identified. The classic approach to subspace estimation is through batch
eigenvalue decomposition (ED) of the sample autocorrelation matrix or ... [full story]
|
by
 Performance of Blind Multiuser Detectors
2.5.1 Performance Measures
In previous sections we have discussed two approaches to blind
multiuser detection: the direct method and the subspace method. These two
approaches are based primarily on two equivalent expressions for the linear MMSE
detector ... [full story]
|
by
 Asymptotics of Detector Estimates
We next examine the consistency and asymptotic variance of the
estimates of the two subspace linear detectors. Assuming that the received
signal samples are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.), then by the
strong law of large numbers, ... [full story]
|
by
 Linear Decorrelating Detector
The linear decorrelating detector given by (2.13) is characterized by the
following results.
Lemma 2.1: The linear decorrelating detector d1 in (2.13) is the unique weight
vector w range(Us),
such that wHs1 = 1, and wHsk = 0 ... [full story]
|
by
 QR-RLS Algorithm
The RLS approach discussed in Section 2.3.2, which is based on the matrix inversion
lemma for recursively updating Cr[i]-1,
has complexity per update. Note that although fast RLS algorithms of
complexity exist [66, 83, 116, 124], all ... [full story]
|
by
 RLS Algorithm
The LMS algorithm discussed above has a very low computational
complexity, on the order of operations per update. However, its
convergence is usually very slow. We next consider the recursive least-squares
(RLS) algorithm for adaptive implementation of the ... [full story]
|
by
 LMS Algorithm
We first consider the least-mean-squares (LMS) algorithm for
recursive estimation of m1 based
on (2.32). Define
Equation 2.35
as a projection matrix that projects any signal in
onto the orthogonal space of s1.
Note that m1 can ... [full story]
|
by
 Blind Multiuser Detection: Direct Methods
It is seen from (2.13) and (2.20) that these two linear
detectors are expressed in terms of a linear combination of the signature
sequences of all K users. Recall that for the
matched-filter receiver, the only ... [full story]
|
by
 Linear MMSE Detector
While the linear decorrelating detector is designed to
eliminate the MAI completely at the expense of enhancing the ambient noise, the
linear MMSE detector, , is designed to minimize the total
effect of the MAI and the ambient ... [full story]
|
by
 Linear Decorrelating Detector
A linear decorrelating detector for user 1, , is such
that when correlated with the received signal r[i], it results
in zero MAI [i.e., the second term in (2.10) is zero]. In particular, the linear decorrelating
detector d1 ... [full story]
|
by
 Synchronous CDMA Signal Model
We start by considering the most basic multiple-access signal
model: a baseband K-user time-invariant
synchronous additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) system, employing periodic
(short) spreading sequences and operating with a coherent BPSK modulation
format. (An approach to ... [full story]
|
by
 Matched Filter/RAKE Receiver
We consider first the particular case of the model of (1.9), in which
there is only a single user (i.e., K = 1), the
channel impulse g1(·, ·) is known to
the receiver, there is no CCI [i.e., ... [full story]
|
by
 Basic Receiver Signal Processing for Wireless
This book is concerned with the design of advanced signal
processing methods for wireless receivers, based largely on the models discussed
in preceding sections. Before moving to these methods, however, it is of
interest to ... [full story]
|
by
 Wireless Channel
From a technical point of view, the greatest distinction
between wireless and wireline communications lies in the physical properties of
wireless channels. These physical properties can be described in terms of
several distinct phenomena, including ambient noise, propagation losses, ... [full story]
|
by
 Multiple-Access Techniques
In Section 1.2.1 we
discussed ways in which a symbol stream associated with a single user can be
transmitted. Many wireless channels, particularly in emerging systems, operate
as multiple-access systems, in which multiple users share the same radio
resources.
There ... [full story]
|
by
 Single-User Modulation Techniques
To discuss advanced receiver signal processing methods for
wireless, it is useful first to specify a general model for the signal received
by a wireless receiver. To do so, we can first think of a single transmitter,
transmitting ... [full story]
|