Cognitive Radio for WMANs
 
Cognitive Radio for WMANs As discussed in Section 4.5, a WMAN will cover an area much larger than a WLAN does. The radius of a WMAN can reach several kilometers. The most widely referred standard for WMANs is IEEE 802.16, also often called as WiMAX standard, or broadband wireless access (BWA) technology. Different from WLAN technologies, WMANs usually support mobile terminals. For instance, the IEEE 802.16e standard can support a terminal moving at a vehicular speed. Like WLANs, a WMAN can also use cognitive radio to make it possible to underlay/overlay in those spectra that have been already occupied by incumbent users. It is to be noted that WiMAX is flexible in its channel sizes and can use the 6 MHz width of the underused TV channels. For a WiMAX system using a bandwidth below 900 MHz, its coverage can be three times larger than that in 2.4 GHz, reducing the number of base stations required well below 3G’s requirements, making mobile WiMAX clouds an even stronger proposition against cellular, both in licensed and unlicensed modes. It is very interesting to note that, many technologies could use TV spectra, though the WiMAX community is keen to claim it for its own. In March 2004, when the IEEE 802.225 group was set up, the 802.16 Working Group was angered when its proposal that the cognitive radio work should be under its auspices, rather than in a separate group, was defeated. However, this has not halted its supporters, led by Intel, in their quest to turn the 802.22 efforts to their advantage. The story behind the conflict between the IEEE 802.16 and the IEEE 802.22 groups highlights the importance of cognitive radio technology and its applications in either WMANs or WRANs (also called “Wi-TV ” technology) operating in underused VHF/UHF TV bands. The IEEE 802.22 working group insisted at the time the group began work that Wi-TV would work with existing IEEE 802 architectures, serving as a “regional area network” complementing both the Wi-Fi LAN and the WiMAX MAN. The IEEE 802.22 group also pointed out that WiMAX is not suitable for TV spectrum because it does not include cognitive radio functions. On the other hand, IEEE 802.16 group denounced that claim, noting that WiMAX does in fact have a provision for cognitive radios (IEEE 802.16h) to avoid interference with other WiMAX devices at higher frequencies, and that it could easily be adapted for UHF frequencies. In December 2004, the IEEE 802.22 group accused the 802.16 group of overstepping its scope and developing its cognitive radios for “coexistence with primary users,” not just WiMAX users, and asked the WiMAX committee to reaffirm the limits of its scope. The WiMAX group declined and received support from another IEEE task group, 802.19, which saw no reason why both groups could not work on the problem separately. The company that controls cognitive radio technology really will have its hand on the rudder of the creation of next-generation communications, and the commercial vendors behind the shadowy IEEE task groups know that. As another development, very recently (according to a report written on February 28, 2005), telecom agencies in India and Canada are working together on a cognitive radio-based broadband wireless technology: The networks will operate in the 5 GHz spectrum (or possibly the licensed Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS) bands) and transmit as far as one to two kilometers. The base station would use as many as 48 antenna beams. The system would use cognitive radio technology to identify interference and poor links and then change its own signal transmission to improve the weak links. Ultimately, the agencies hope to develop this as a low-costs system that can be used in underdeveloped regions or areas with aging telecom infrastructure. It is interesting to see that an Indian government body is involved in such a research project which appears to be primarily targeted at unlicensed bands, given that India only very recently de-licensed the 2.4 GHz band for Wi-Fi. The 5.1 GHz band is still only available for unlicensed use indoors.
414 times read
|