Header
Home | Sitemap  
Sections
Syndication



Top Down, Bottoms-Up Reconciliation Model

by

image

 

Top Down, Bottoms-Up Reconciliation Model

Most industry analysts and Wall Street bankers, as well as large corporate financial professionals, are well versed in creating top-down analyses. That is, they are used to undertaking "aggregate" market studies and valuations based on third-party-study house reports of market sizes as well as developing market values based on P/E multiples, EBITDA multiples, NPV/DCF models, or some other aggregate metric. The problem with many third-party market studies is that we already know what they will present before we ever purchase the study. That is, we will see a gross market demand slope over the study period increasing at approximately a 45–60° slope.

The period under study will change from one report to another, as will the metrics on the vertical scale, but the slope is almost always the same (Figure 5).

Click To expand
Figure 5: Typical Third-Party Market Study Slopes

Hence, we must rationalize aggregate estimates and third-party market studies with a "bottoms-up" analysis.

134 times read

Related news

» Top Down, Bottoms-Up Reconciliation Model
by admin posted on Jul 25,2007
» Slope Analysis
by admin posted on Apr 23,2007
» Slope Analysis
by admin posted on Jul 25,2007
» A Bottoms-Up Approach
by admin posted on Jul 25,2007
» A Bottoms-Up Approach
by admin posted on Apr 23,2007


More Top News
Cisco Wireless Networking
Most Popular
Featured Author

Rifat Sanaç

image
wireless master.